Editorial
Pre-GFAR 2003 CSO Workshop
Keynote Addresses
From Dresden to Dakar
Roundtable Discussions
Poster Session
Side Events
Sub-plenary Session on GPPs
Stakeholder Consultations
GFAR 2003 Conference Evaluation
Back to CONTENTS
List of Acronyms
|
Stakeholder Consultations
Farmers' Organizations (FOs)
In the afternoon of the second day of the conference, stakeholder groups deliberated on their future contribution to GFAR, particularly on issues that each constituency group deemed critical for inclusion in the GFAR Business Plan 2004-2006 and in which they propose to be actively involved in the coming three years. The seven stakeholder groups were asked to provide some feedback on emerging issues outlined by the keynote speakers, and to suggest ways on how to improve their involvement in ARD activities at the sub-regional, regional and global levels. They also deliberated on strategies to improve their representation in various decision- and policy-making mechanisms at these different levels. Comprehensive terms of reference outlining the above discussion issues and others were provided to participants (Boxes 13-17 and 19-21).
Box 13. Guidelines for the Stakeholder Group Meetings
The GFAR stakeholder group consultation sessions provide a unique opportunity for the stakeholder constituencies to discuss and prepare for the full range of topics that have been or are to be addressed during the conference, and to evaluate the outcomes of the conference from a specific stakeholder perspective.
The three specific objectives of these sessions are to:
- allow each constituency group to express its evaluation of the conference organization and outputs
- formulate its stakeholder statement which will be delivered by a person designated by them at the closing session
- discuss a range of issues that the constituency group deems critical for the development of the next GFAR business plan in which the constituency proposes to be actively involved in the coming three years.
Practical arrangements
- Grouping in this session will be strictly by stakeholder group and participants are only allowed to join the stakeholder group to which they belong
- Each group will be assigned to meet in a given room which will be announced during the conference.
Roundtable mechanics
With the exception of the NARS, management of the groups is left to the groups themselves as no pre-assigned facilitators will be provided. However, to aid in the preparation of a synthesis, the groups must nominate a facilitator and rapporteur. The Chair of GFAR will lead the NARS stakeholder consultation, and no facilitators will be provided. However, the group must select a rapporteur.
- The facilitator will animate the discussions and ensure that the objectives are met and that most participants have the opportunity to express their views and opinions on the subject. It is important that the facilitator is able to elicit concrete recommendations on the subject.
- The rapporteur will be responsible for capturing the salient points in the discussion. He/she will have to make sure that issues raised and agreements reached are documented. All rapporteurs will meet in the evening with the GFAR Management Team to synthesize discussion outputs which will then be presented the following day in Plenary Session III. Facilitators are welcome to join.
A set of issues for discussion will be provided by the GFAR Secretariat for the consideration of the groups. Background documents, if any, will also be made available.
It will be difficult for the synthesis group to analyze and capture the richness and diversity of discussion in the groups. In order to capture the main contributions of the participants, it is critical that the rapporteurs follow the attached guidelines and report the results in the same format.
Expected output and plenary session reports
The expected outputs of these sessions include:
- Stakeholder assessments of the conference as a constituency
- Stakeholder statements to be presented at the end of the conference, with mention of the specific points of importance to their constituency and identification of some GFAR activities that they suggest be in the GFAR business plan for the coming three years. These are activities in which they want to be actively involved, and possibly take a leading responsibility in their implementation.
|
FOs acknowledge and appreciate the effort to pay particular attention to farmers' needs, and urge other stakeholders to recognize that small farmers are in fact the principal and most important rural developers. As such they must be supported and empowered to be effective partners in the development process.
Farmers request assistance in capacity-building in the following three areas: (1) leadership - to ensure effective representation; (2) advocacy and policy formulation - primarily to reverse the decline in funding of agricultural research; and (3) ICT - to improve communication and dissemination of information.
They stress the importance of farmer participation in priority-setting and decision-making processes, particularly at the grassroots level. However, particular attention needs to be taken in order to ensure legitimacy of representation and accountability to the constituents. Representatives must be chosen by FOs themselves and not simply appointed by other stakeholders, governments or research bodies.
Extension, the link from researcher to farmer, needs to be more effective, and the results of agricultural research need to be more accessible and user-friendly for the average farmer. FOs suggest that GFAR can play an important role in facilitating information exchanges between researchers and farmers, and between farmers themselves. Farmers want better access to research results and at the same time want to build on local knowledge. This can be achieved through coordination of the activities of NARIs and exchange visits/study tours for farmers at the sub-regional level.
The new areas of research the FOs would like to see GFAR give attention to are: (1) agriculture and energy - better supply and greater efficiency in use; (2) agriculture and globalization - evaluation of the impact of globalization on the livelihood of small farmers; and (3) agriculture and health - study the cost to farmers in meeting health, sanitary, phytosanitary and traceability requirements for export of food and farm products.
Additionally, the FO stakeholder group urges GFAR to endorse and promote the declaration of the side event on the International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture.
Regional and sub-regional farmer focal points were nominated at the meeting (Box 1), and they will endeavor to work closely with GFAR in the future on issues of importance to farmers. Their status as representatives will be confirmed at the 13th GFAR Steering Committee Meeting in October 2004, Nairobi, Kenya.
Box 15. Issues for Discussion: Farmers' Organizations
NB: This session should be seen as part of and follow-up to the two-day Pre-GFAR 2003 CSO Workshop held on 20-21 May.
GFAR invites FOs involved in ARD to deliberate their future contribution to the GFAR initiative, and would like to solicit specific feedback on the following issues:
- emerging issues of relevance to ARD, that should be given priority in the GFAR business plan as outlined by the keynote speakers and where FOs can best contribute to the advancement of these issues
- specific questions and challenges raised by the GFAR Executive Secretary in his analysis of achievements, gaps and the way forward
- the needs and concerns of FOs that should be addressed in the GFAR business plan such as, but not limited to, capacity-building needs, improving communication systems and strengthening links between farmers-extension workers-researchers
- specific comparative advantage of FOs in their collaboration with and contribution to GFAR
- comments on the conference in general and suggestions for workshops or follow-up activities that are considered priorities for the next business plan
- suggestions on how to improve the representation of FOs at SRF, RF and GFAR levels, which must stem from stronger involvement of FOs in NARS themselves, and how this may be best fostered
- any other issue of relevance to GFAR.
Naturally these are suggestions of issues that could be discussed, therefore please add any other issues you feel are of relevance to GFAR as you deliberate and consult amongst yourselves. Your conclusions and recommendations should be such that we can use them as components of a framework for the next GFAR business plan.
|
Print version
|